Found cheaper? We match it — see conditions. Incorporation and secretary transfer also carry a 30-day money-back guarantee.
No feed from your books. No shared customer list. Just a screen that looks finished.

90 days
of warranty after launch, at no extra cost — new features are a new quote
Four, or it's a feature list wearing a name
SCOPE
What it has to do, written down first
Not a wishlist — the actual decisions someone will otherwise be asked to make halfway through the build, after the invoice already went out.
DATA
Where the real numbers already live
The customer list, the price list, the stock count — whichever system already holds the true version, not a copy of it typed into the new tool separately.
DECISIONS
Who answers the open questions, and how fast
A build stalls on an unanswered question far more often than on anything technical — the timeline moves at the speed of the reader's replies.
OWNERSHIP
Who holds the code and the keys after launch
The account, the source code and the infrastructure it runs on — yours to move or maintain, not held by whoever happened to build it.
+ software with all four settled before the build starts rarely turns into scope negotiated after the invoice
+ software missing any one of them tends to become exactly the island it was meant to replace
What one re-typed record becomes
A record retyped once feels like nothing. It's the multiplication that costs — this is an illustrative estimate, not a measured figure:
None of that shows up as a line item anywhere. It's the time the new tool was supposed to save, quietly spent making sure it still agrees with the old one.
And commissioning the build doesn't hand off what 'correct' means
A developer can build exactly to the brief they're given. Deciding what the true customer list is, what the real price is, what counts as 'in stock' — when the new tool and an existing spreadsheet disagree — is a call only the business can make, whoever wrote the code.
No single law governs this — it's true of any custom build, commissioned anywhere: a developer owns the code they ship, but the underlying business record stays the company's to define and keep accurate, before and after the build exists.
The one question that decides this
What the build actually gets built from
On the build itself, a developer or agency and OCTIS do the same job. The difference shows up the first time the new tool needs to agree with something else in the business:
From a scoped build to a record that stays one record
Inside one account, a connection runs from the real record to the build — not the other way round:
The build is scoped against how the business actually runs
the real process, not a generic feature list
It's built inside the same account as your bookkeeping, filings and CRM
not a separate login, a separate database, a separate export to keep current
It reads from those records directly
the customer already in the CRM, the invoice already in the books — not re-typed to exist a second time
The record stays one record
update it once, and everything built on top of it — this tool included — sees the same version
A single-project developer or agency has no reason to hold the rest of the company's data — their engagement starts and ends with this one build. It takes whatever it's handed on trust, the same trust the reader is then left keeping updated by hand. Only a firm already running the company's back office can build something that reads the real record instead of asking for its own copy.
The one decision that decides everything after it
Not a matter of budget or polish — a decision made in the first week of scoping. Every re-typed record afterward is a direct consequence of which side of it the build landed on.
What a connected build asks you to set up separately
0
new logins, databases or exports to keep in sync — a build made inside the same account reads what's already there.
What a build delivered and handed over cannot compound
What they do well
A development shop will build what was specified, and a good one will build it well. The engineering is genuinely not the hard part of this.
What their shape can't reach
Their engagement ends at handover, so the build is an island: the next report, dashboard or automation starts over, negotiating access to data it cannot see. Built where the records already are, each one reads the same connected data as the last.
From a described process to a build that's live
There's no price to show before the scope exists — this is the actual sequence, and the one stage that decides how fast it moves:
You describe how the work actually happens today
the process, the exceptions, the spreadsheet or tool currently gluing it together — not a feature list, a description of the job
We scope it, prototype it, and agree the price
a fixed-scope project with an agreed price and timeline, or a dedicated team on a monthly retainer — the number exists once the shape does
We build in stages and show you as we go
working screens shown early, so a wrong turn gets caught before it's built, not after
It launches, with 90 days on us
bugs found in the first 90 days are fixed at no extra cost — a new feature is a new quote, not a warranty claim
The stage that moves the timeline more than engineering does is the second one, repeated: every open question we send back sits until it's answered, and a build with a question sitting in an inbox has stopped, even while the clock on it keeps running.
Who does the work
OCTIS's own engineering team
Not outsourced per project — the same team that builds and maintains OCTIS itself, working from the process you describe.
Who this isn't for
An existing tool already does most of what you need
If off-the-shelf software already covers 80% of it, buy that instead — it's cheaper and faster than commissioning something custom to match. We'll say so, even though a custom build pays us more.
Not the guarantee
The 30-day money-back guarantee doesn't cover custom builds
It covers new company incorporation and transfer of company secretary. In its place: a fixed-scope project is billed by agreed milestone, not paid in full up front, and a dedicated-team retainer can be cancelled any month — whatever's been built by then is yours to keep.
Not covered
Fully custom — scoped to your process, not assembled from a template. If a template or an off-the-shelf tool would genuinely do the job, we'll tell you that instead of scoping a build you don't need.
Custom software is quote-based on scope and complexity — there's no fixed number to show before that scope exists. Two ways to engage: a fixed-scope project with an agreed price and timeline, or a dedicated team on a monthly retainer. AI accelerates the build, so we run lean and pass that saving on.
Yes — the code, the account and the infrastructure it runs on. We build it, document it and hand it over, so you're never locked into a system only we can maintain.
The build runs inside the same account that already holds your bookkeeping, filings and CRM, so it reads your real records instead of asking for its own copy that someone then has to keep updated by hand. A single-project developer has no access to that back office to build against.
Bugs found in the first 90 days after launch, fixed at no extra cost. A new feature or a change in scope isn't a bug — that's a new quote, agreed the same way the original build was.
The build was never the hard part. Staying connected to what the business already knows is.
Tell us how the work actually happens today. We'll tell you honestly whether a custom build fixes it, or whether something off-the-shelf already would.