Found cheaper? We match it — see conditions. Incorporation and secretary transfer also carry a 30-day money-back guarantee.
A prompt goes in. A clip comes out in a minute. Nothing in it is actually yours.

4
production modes in one subscription
Four modes, one prompt box
TEXT-TO-VIDEO
Text-to-video
Describe the scene, the style and the message — the tool renders a clip from the words alone.
IMAGE-TO-VIDEO
Image-to-video
Upload a product photo or a design and it becomes a moving clip — no reshoot, no new asset needed.
AVATAR
AI avatar
A generated spokesperson delivers your script on camera — no presenter, no studio, no camera crew.
VOICEOVER
Voiceover & captions
A voice profile reads the script and captions sync to it automatically — nothing recorded by hand.
+ all four modes draw from the same prompt box, and the prompt is still what decides whether the output is generic or specific
+ regenerating costs nothing extra to attempt — the constraint here was never how many tries you get
What the same prompt box produces either way
This is an illustrative pair, not a real business's actual prompts — but it's the exact difference one written-down fact makes on the same tool, the same minute:
Neither prompt was badly written. The first one just had nothing specific to draw on — and no amount of rephrasing it fixes that; only the missing fact does.
The approval is still yours
The tool can render a clip and put words on screen faster than briefing a person ever could. Whether what it says is actually true about the product — that still needs someone from the business to look at it before it goes anywhere.
Content published under a business's name is generally treated as the business's own representation, however it was produced — a generated clip doesn't change who is answerable if what it claims turns out not to be true. Which specific advertising or consumer-protection provision applies is being confirmed with legal before this page cites one directly.
The one question that decides this
What the prompt has to carry on its own
On the generation itself, a standalone AI video tool and OCTIS do the same job. The difference shows up the moment the prompt needs a fact the typer doesn't have memorised:
What's already one tab over
The product catalogue, pricing and deal history already live in the same account
not a separate tool, not someone's memory of a sales call
Writing the prompt means opening a second tab, not hunting through five
the bestseller, its price, who actually buys it — already on record
The prompt can name something true and specific instead of something generic
because the fact was one click away, not something you had to recall under a deadline
The clip says something only this business could say
not a version any competitor's copy of the same tool would also produce
A standalone AI video tool has never seen the business's product catalogue or its customer history — it only ever sees the prompt box. It has no way to know the actual bestseller or the actual price, because it doesn't run any other part of the business. All it can do is ask you to type more.
What makes a clip publish-ready
This is a binary, not a matter of finish quality:
The tool can't tell a claim that's true from one that just sounds plausible. That check is still a human one, every time — approving isn't optional, it's the last step, not an extra one.
What you have to go find
0
extra tools opened to find the product's actual price and who buys it — it's already in the same account the prompt box sits in.
What actually fixes a generic-looking clip
What it looks like
A faster renderer, more tokens, a bigger plan — that's what fixes video that sounds like everyone else's
What's actually true
None of that touches the actual gap. You still have to know what to say before any tool, at any speed, can say it well
Render speed was never the constraint here. What went into the prompt was.
From what you're producing to a plan sized around it
There's no fixed price to show, because no plan fits everyone's volume — this is the actual sequence, and where the number gets decided:
You tell us what you're producing
how many pieces a month, which modes, for which channels
We size a token plan against that
matched to your volume, not a one-size subscription
You generate, preview and approve
inside the token allowance — a person from your business signs off before anything is final
You download and publish
on your own channels, in your own time — the plan doesn't post on your behalf
Sizing the plan takes a short conversation, not an instant checkout — we won't pretend a volume-based allocation is a single click.
Who does the work
You generate; a person from your business approves before anything publishes
The tool renders the clip. Whether it's accurate and on-brand is still a human call, every time.
Tokens
Spent across all four modes, however you split them
No fixed per-mode pool to plan around — text-to-video one week, avatar the next.
Not included
Publishing to your channels
You download the finished file and post it — the plan doesn't have platform access to publish for you.
Not covered
Because no single number is honest here — token plans are sized to how many pieces a month you're producing and which modes you use, not a flat subscription that fits everyone. We'll size a plan with you before you commit to one, rather than quote a figure that doesn't match your volume.
No. It renders the clip and you download it. Publishing to your own channels — and confirming the clip is accurate and on-brand first — is still a step someone from your business does, every time.
The tool itself isn't the difference — the prompt is. A standalone tool only ever sees what you type into the box. Because your product catalogue and deal history already sit in the same account, the fact your prompt needs is one tab over instead of something you have to recall from memory.
Then that's worth fixing before generating anything — no AI video tool, ours included, produces something specific from a business that hasn't written down what makes its product different. A plan doesn't fix that; deciding it does.
Yes — text-to-video, image-to-video, AI avatar and voiceover all draw from the same allowance, however you choose to split it across a given month.
The video was never the bottleneck. Knowing what to say was.
Tell us what you're producing — the facts it needs are already in your account. We'll size a plan around your actual volume before you commit to one.